Tion on the form (17): . x = f ( x ) + g( x )u (17) exactly where
Tion of your form (17): . x = f ( x ) + g( x )u (17) where x = EqTis the state vector, and f ( x ) and g( x ) are as follows: – 0 0, 0, 1 TdT0 Vs Eq Pm D f ( x ) = – 2J ( – 0 ) + 0 2J – 2J xd sin() , g( x ) = 1 – T Eq + T1 xdx- xd Vs cos() d d0 d(18)Electronics 2021, 10, ten, FOR PEER Overview Electronics 2021, 10, x x FOR PEER Review Electronics 2021, x FOR PEER Evaluation Electronics 2021, ten, x x FOR PEER Evaluation Electronics 2021, ten, FOR PEER REVIEW7 7of 17 17 of 17 7 of 7 7 of 17 of- – – – () () 0,0, – (18) , -)= – – – Electronics 2021, 10, 2637 7 of 17 + () () () = 0,0, ()()– ( — ++ — (),() = 0,0, ,, (18) () (18) (18) – + ()= – ( -) + == ()() = 0,0, — – ( + () == — -+ ) + () (),() == 0,0, , () (18) () 0,0, (18) – + () () reThe handle input plus the measurable output are defined as = and = , — ++ () () spectively. Evidently, the SG model (18)Thecontrol inputand Brunovsky form requirement. defined as = E and = y ,, , doesn’t input and also the measurable output defined as = The handle satisfy the the measurable output areare defined as = and and=, =reThe controlinput along with the measurable output aredefined as u = and = re-re The controlinput along with the measurable output are f The handle the SGand This D-Fructose-6-phosphate disodium salt Epigenetic Reader Domain challenge is resolved by utilizing the spectively. Evidently, the andmodel measurablesatisfy the Brunovsky type requirement. redifferentialcontrol input model measurablenot satisfy the Brunovsky type and = , spectively.TheEvidently, the SG model (18) does not satisfy areBrunovsky formrequirement. reEvidently, input model (18) does output the Brunovsky = requirement. spectively. Evidently, idea. the (18) doesn’t output are defined as kind requirement. and = , respectively. flatnessthe SGSG the(18) will not satisfy the defined as = the SG the differential not satisfy the This spectively.resolved by utilizing model (18) doesflatness idea.Brunovsky form requirement. situation isisis Evidently,utilizing the differential flatness notion. This spectively. Evidently, the the model (18) will not notion. Brunovsky form requirement. challenge is resolved by utilizing the differential flatness notion. This issue resolved by utilizing SG differential flatness satisfy the This challenge resolved by three.2. Flatness-Based SG Model This challenge isis resolved by using the differential flatness idea. This situation resolved by using the differential flatness notion. three.two. Flatness-Based the Model 3.two. Flatness-Based Model three.two. Flatness-Based SG Model In order to meet the system3.two. Flatness-Based SGBrunovsky type in technique (1), the requirement of SGSG Model 3.2.order to to meetflatness-based model of SGtheBrunovsky type in in program (1), the differential flatness theory is employed In ML-SA1 References Flatness-Basedthesystem requirement of ofis de3.two.order tomeet SG Model requirement In [44] then, a SG method requirement ofthe Brunovsky type insystem (1), the In Flatness-Based the Model requirement order meet the Brunovsky type program (1), the In an effort to meet the system veloped. In order differential flatness totheoryisemployed [44] after which, aaflatness-based formmodelSGisSG(1), the differential flatnesstheory the employedrequirement of aaBrunovsky model in ofof isde[44] then, Brunovsky model system (1), is differentialorder to theory the employed [44] after which,the flatness-based inof systemde- the differentialflatness meet is issystem requirement on the flatness-based model SGSG is deIn flatness theory is method [44] then,.