Aternary 2021, four, 38 ference within the digestion pattern in between bird and bat femora for instance, due to the fact these components are Roniciclib Cell Cycle/DNA Damage somewhat brief and robust using a related shape and size.11 ofQuaternary 2021, four, x FOR PEER Review 12 of 20 Figure 8. Digestion pattern on mandibles/dentaries (mean values of your information from the two observers for every taxon; detailed Figure 8. Digestion pattern on mandibles/dentaries (imply values of the data in the two observdata in Table S6). ers for each taxon; detailed data in Table S6).With regards to differences amongst components inside the very same faunal group (intra-taxa Concerning differences among elements within exactly the same faunal group (intrataxa variability), we see, as an example, that the bat radius is considerably additional digested than the fe variability), we see, as an example, that the bat radius is much much more digested than the femur mur (Figure 9, Table S6). This is likely on account of the size and shape of bones: the radius is (Figure 9, Table S6). This can be likely as a result of the size and shape of bones: the radius quite extended and narrow, and often exceeds the pellet size, creating it additional exposed to di is extremely long and narrow, and generally exceeds the pellet size, making it more exposed to digestion. In contrast, amongst birds there is considerable difference in in pattern of of gestion. In contrast, among birds there is no no important difference the the patterndi digestion amongst the 4 extended bones examined (humerus, femur, carpometacarpus and gestion involving the four extended bones examined (humerus, femur, carpometacarpus and tarsometatarsus), simply because these elements all show a relatively brief size inside the regarded as tarsometatarsus), for the reason that these elements all show a comparatively short size in the consid species (Figure ten). ered species (Figure 10).Figure 9. Digestion pattern on bat radius and femur (mean values of proximal and distal parts from Figure 9. Digestion pattern on bat radius and femur (mean values of proximal and distal components from the two observers; detailed information in Table S6). the two observers; detailed information in Table S6).Quaternary 2021, four,Figure 9. Digestion pattern on bat radius and femur (mean values of proximal and distal parts from the two observers; detailed information in Table S6).12 ofFigure ten. Digestion pattern on bird lengthy bones (imply values of proximal and distal components in the two observers; detailed Figure ten. Digestion pattern on bird long bones (imply values of proximal and distal parts in the data in Table S6).two observers; detailed data in Table S6).On the other hand, variations may be observed involving distinctive parts when comparing the13 of 20 However, variations can be observed among diverse parts when comparing the digested exact same element. This really is the case for bird femora, for which the distal aspect is a lot more than the proximal aspect (Figure 11). JPH203 manufacturer Consequently, within precisely the same bone, the pattern of exact same element. That is the case for bird femora, for which the distal aspect is extra digested digestion can differ considerably. The exact same observation could be made for rodent than the proximal component (Figure 11). Consequently, within exactly the same bone, the pattern of and bat femora, even though the reverse is observed for bird tarsometatarsus and smaller mammal tibia digestion can differ considerably. Exactly the same observation may be produced for rodent and bat (proximal aspect additional digested than distal component). In contrast, the digestion pattern is really is quite (proximal part far more digested than distal portion). In.