Xclude “Include patents” and “Include quotes”. The search resulted in 1079 hits for sound localization and 670 hits for sound lateralization. These contents were sorted in descending order of relevance. The 1000 hits with the upper limit displayed from the major for sound localization as well as the 670 hits for sound lateralization had been investigated. Following inspection on the URLs, it was discovered that 982 hits for sound localization and 653 hits for sound lateralization were valid for evaluation, immediately after excluding links that displayed a “Not found” or “Not connected” message. These hit numbers had been set as the initial values for screening for this critique. The screening method plus the number of resulting hits are shown in Figure 1. Consequently, nine scientific articles for the critique of sound localization and five for sound lateralization were picked up. The five articles for sound lateralization, even so, had been exactly the same as the nine articles for localization, so these nine articles had been chosen. Additionally, the nine articles for sound localization had been categorized into these with normal-alpha-D-glucose Protocol hearing participants with bilateral simulated CHL (3 articles: Table 1) and these with bilateral CHL (six articles: Table 2).Audiol. Res. 2021,Table 1. Studies on sound localization or lateralization with bone conduction for simulated conductive hearing loss from 2012 to August 2021. No. Authors (Year) Participants Devices Stimuli Presentation Levels Setup Twelve loudspeakers (aligned inside a horizontal circular setup: an angular interval of 30 ) Test Situations Evaluation of BCD1 (ADHEAR), comparison between unilateral and bilateral fitting, and comparison in between BCD1 and BCD2 (Baha 5) (i) Unaided, (ii) aided with one particular BAHS sound processor Propaquizafop Autophagy mounted on a SoundArc, (iii) aided with 2 BAHS sound processors on a single SoundArc, (iv) aided with 1 BAHS sound processor on a softband, and (v) aided with two BAHS sound processors on a single soft band Normal hearing, unilateral plug, unilateral plug + ipsilateral aBCD, unilateral plug +ipsilateral aBCD+ contralateral pinna mold, bilateral plugs, bilateral plugs + bilateral aBCDs, and bilateral plugs + unilateral aBCDGawliczek et al. (2018a) [21]15 participants with induced bilateral CHLaBCD(s) (ADHEAR) and BCD(s) attached to a softband (Baha5)White noise (200 ms duration)Between 60 and 65 dB SPLGawliczek et al. (2018b) [22]15 participants with simulated bilateral CHL using a combination of ear plugs and silicon mould materialBCD(s) (Baha5) (SoundArc plus a softband)White noise (200 ms duration)60, 65, and 70 dB SPLTwelve loudspeakers (aligned inside a horizontal circular setup: an angular interval of 30 )Snapp et al. (2020) [23]11 listeners with simulated CHL with plug(s)aBCD(s) (ADHER)Broadband (BB; 0.50 kHz), high-pass (HP; 30 kHz), and low-pass (LP; 0.five.5 kHz) noise bursts (150 ms duration)45, 55, and 65 dB ATwenty-four loudspeakers (the horizontal (0 ) and vertical (+40 /-30 ) planes (The speakers were covered by a black, sound emitting curtain)Abbreviations: aBCD, adhesive bone conduction device; BAHS, bone-anchored hearing systems; CHL, conductive hearing loss.Audiol. Res. 2021,Table 2. Studies on sound localization or lateralization with bone conduction device(s) for bilateral conductive hearing loss from 2012 to August 2021.No. Authors (Year) Participants 10 kids with serious bilateral CHL on account of congenital big or minor ear anomalies with microtia or anotia or on account of resistant chronic inflammation 32 patients with conge.