En in MSM/TG will help identify if routine cancer screening, HPV testing, and HPV vaccination campaigns should be a priority for these populations.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Karen Munoz for her assistance in translating materials. We would also like to thank the gay men’s community center Epicentro in Lima for hosting the study activities. Thanks to Ms. Sandra Perez for editorial assistance.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: BB JG MB. Performed the experiments: CN HS. Analyzed the data: CN BB JG. Wrote the paper: CN BB JG HS MB.
Harvesting can change the demographics of wild populations of animals [1,2], and the evolution of heritable traits [3?]. There is increasing Avermectin B1a web evidence that changes to key demographic parameters and physical attributes (e.g. reduced body size, earlier sexual maturity, reduced antler size) that have been observed over time in exploited populations are due to human-induced evolution caused by selection against desirable phenotypes through harvest [6]. It has increasingly been recognized that individuals of a certain size, morphology or behavior are more likely than others to be removed from a population by harvesting [7,8]. Among the consistent individual differences in behavioral traits (defined as personality), are exploratory behavior, aggression, and risk taking [9]. Since the landmark study by Wilson et al. [10], there is increasing evidence that an animal’s susceptibility to capture is related to Lixisenatide cost personality (e.g. fish: [11,12]; mammals: [13]; birds: [14]). In harvested populations, heterogeneity in individual personalities may lead to the extinction of vulnerable traits: individuals more susceptible to capture will have increased mortality rates and will progressively disappear from the population [15,16]. Because of this heterogeneity and because personality traits appear to be heritable [17], selection will occur and the surviving population will differ from the original unharvested population. However, a major difficulty in examining the evolutionary and ecological consequences of consistent individual personality differences in harvested populations is hidden heterogeneity. Heterogeneity can be modeled with known individual covariates (sex, age, etc.), yet the precise cause of heterogeneity is often not identified, or not measured. To date, studies that related animalPLOS ONE | www.plosone.orgpersonality to life history traits have relied on assessing individual personality through experimental assays where animal scores are coded in standardized tests, and subjective ranking of personality traits are made by human observers [18]. However, unobserved factors at the individual level may generate hidden variability in susceptibility to capture or harvest and can lead to populationlevel patterns that are not always representative of the actual relationship at the individual level [15]. For example, consider a population consisting of two types of members in equal numbers which differ in values of both survival from harvesting and survival from natural mortality (i.e. heterogeneity in survival), and that there is no compensatory mortality in each subpopulation. Then, Johnson et al. [16] demonstrated that if both subpopulations are not distinguished one might infer that the population partly compensates for harvesting mortality by reduced natural mortality. Thus, heterogeneity in survival rates among members of two subpopulations of a harvested population could give.En in MSM/TG will help identify if routine cancer screening, HPV testing, and HPV vaccination campaigns should be a priority for these populations.AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Karen Munoz for her assistance in translating materials. We would also like to thank the gay men’s community center Epicentro in Lima for hosting the study activities. Thanks to Ms. Sandra Perez for editorial assistance.Author ContributionsConceived and designed the experiments: BB JG MB. Performed the experiments: CN HS. Analyzed the data: CN BB JG. Wrote the paper: CN BB JG HS MB.
Harvesting can change the demographics of wild populations of animals [1,2], and the evolution of heritable traits [3?]. There is increasing evidence that changes to key demographic parameters and physical attributes (e.g. reduced body size, earlier sexual maturity, reduced antler size) that have been observed over time in exploited populations are due to human-induced evolution caused by selection against desirable phenotypes through harvest [6]. It has increasingly been recognized that individuals of a certain size, morphology or behavior are more likely than others to be removed from a population by harvesting [7,8]. Among the consistent individual differences in behavioral traits (defined as personality), are exploratory behavior, aggression, and risk taking [9]. Since the landmark study by Wilson et al. [10], there is increasing evidence that an animal’s susceptibility to capture is related to personality (e.g. fish: [11,12]; mammals: [13]; birds: [14]). In harvested populations, heterogeneity in individual personalities may lead to the extinction of vulnerable traits: individuals more susceptible to capture will have increased mortality rates and will progressively disappear from the population [15,16]. Because of this heterogeneity and because personality traits appear to be heritable [17], selection will occur and the surviving population will differ from the original unharvested population. However, a major difficulty in examining the evolutionary and ecological consequences of consistent individual personality differences in harvested populations is hidden heterogeneity. Heterogeneity can be modeled with known individual covariates (sex, age, etc.), yet the precise cause of heterogeneity is often not identified, or not measured. To date, studies that related animalPLOS ONE | www.plosone.orgpersonality to life history traits have relied on assessing individual personality through experimental assays where animal scores are coded in standardized tests, and subjective ranking of personality traits are made by human observers [18]. However, unobserved factors at the individual level may generate hidden variability in susceptibility to capture or harvest and can lead to populationlevel patterns that are not always representative of the actual relationship at the individual level [15]. For example, consider a population consisting of two types of members in equal numbers which differ in values of both survival from harvesting and survival from natural mortality (i.e. heterogeneity in survival), and that there is no compensatory mortality in each subpopulation. Then, Johnson et al. [16] demonstrated that if both subpopulations are not distinguished one might infer that the population partly compensates for harvesting mortality by reduced natural mortality. Thus, heterogeneity in survival rates among members of two subpopulations of a harvested population could give.