in regions that did not threshold properly; this was done by directly comparing the thresholded image to the original image. Finally, the areas of the individual airways were measured and copied to a spreadsheet program for analysis. Regions with an area,50 pixels were not included in the analysis, as they generally resulted from incomplete thresholding or repair. The equivalent diameter of each airspace was calculated, and D0, s2, and c were then determined for each image from which D1 and D2 were then calculated. This manual technique required about 5�C7 minutes per image, the bulk of which was used for the image repair. We note that airspaces truncated by the borders of the image frame were included in the D2 analyses. This was necessitated by the fact that Lm was calculated on the entire image frame, and to make a fair comparison of Lm and D2 they must be calculated on the same exact images. We point out that the truncation may result in D2 measurements that are skewed to somewhat low values. However, the exclusion of these airspaces altogether only serves to filter out the largest airspaces since they are most likely to border the edge and thus further skew the results to even lower values. To verify this we eliminated the edge-bordering airspaces and reanalyzed D2 and Lm on all the images. We found that although D2 dropped considerably for the smoke-exposed group, it was still significantly higher than for the control group. Lm for the smoke-exposed group, on the other hand, dropped so much that it became dramatically lower than for the control group. Therefore, 6-Carboxy-X-rhodamine elimination of truncated airspaces clearly misrepresents the true nature of the lung tissue much worse than including the truncated airspaces. Hence, airspaces were defined by the edge of the optical image. Ideally, acquisition of larger image fields would be desirable so that truncated airspaces could be excluded without affecting results, as was done in Ref.. This was not possible herein, as D2 was calculated after the completion of the Lm study. A statistical comparison was made between manual and 1233948-61-2 automatic measurements of D0, D1, and D2 to determine how well the individual measurements for the